No scope for extrajudicial killings, even with state approval: HRSS

Human Rights Support Society (HRSS) has expressed concern and condemnation over Inspector General of Police (IGP) Ali Hossain Fakir’s remarks that police would carry out crossfire killings if the government allowed them, questioning whether the government considers extrajudicial killings permissible or whether the statement reflects the police chief’s personal views.

In a statement issued today (26 October), the human rights organisation said linking the possibility of extrajudicial killings to government approval in the name of maintaining law and order raises serious concerns about the rule of law, justice and human rights.

The organisation said preventing crime and ensuring public safety are responsibilities of the state. However, these duties must be carried out through lawful procedures, impartial investigations and respect for the authority of the judiciary.

Being accused of a crime does not deprive anyone of their right to life or a fair trial, it added.

Citing Articles 31 and 32 of the Constitution, which safeguard the right to legal protection and the right to life and personal liberty, HRSS said international human rights law also guarantees the right to life and due process.

Crossfire, therefore, cannot be a substitute for judicial proceedings, the organisation said.

HRSS demanded a clear and unequivocal explanation from the government regarding the IGP’s remarks. It also called on the government to commit to preventing law enforcement agencies from carrying out unlawful killings and ensuring accountability for such acts.

Ijajul Islam, executive director of HRSS, said the legitimacy of the state’s use of force to combat crime depends on adherence to the law, not on extrajudicial methods.

To establish the rule of law, offenders must be tried in court, he said, adding that extrajudicial killings cannot be justified even with state approval.